|
Vice Premier Qian Qichen, Member of the Political
Bureau of the Central Committee of CPC met with a delegation
from the United Daily News Group of Taiwan on August 25,
during which he answered questions raised by the
delegation.
Qian said that he is optimistic
about the prospects of the development of the cross-Straits
relations, which have witnessed
expanding
exchanges and cooperation in economic, cultural and other
fields and frequent personnel contacts in the recent decade.
However, there also exist some political hurdles between the
two sides of the Taiwan Straits. The major problem is that
the leader of the Taiwan authorities still refuses to
consider himself a Chinese, evades the one-China principle
and plays word games resulting in the stalemate of
cross-Straits dialogues and negotiations. As far as the
Taiwan question is concerned, the One China Principle we
advocate is that there is only one China in the world, of
which both Mainland and Taiwan are part; China’s
sovereignty and territorial integrity brooks no separation.
One China is the common ground that both sides of the Taiwan
Straits share and under the One China Principle, we take no
exception to the maintenance of economic and cultural ties
between Taiwan and foreign countries. By pursuing the
“Two States Theory”, Taiwan will only find
itself in an ever narrowing international space.
Qian told the visitors "Taiwan independence" will
never be accepted by the international community and the
Chinese people, including the majority of Taiwan
compatriots. "Taiwan independence" is dangerous
and will lead nowhere.
According to Qian, the
earlier realization of direct trade, postal, air and
shipping services between the mainland and Taiwan is the
ardent wish of the people on both sides of the Straits. Now
Taiwan compatriots have to come to Mainland via a third
venue instead of coming straight to Mainland through the
normal route, causing great waste in terms of time, manpower
and resources. As early as 20 years ago, we put
forward the proposal of three direct links. Taiwan’s
“National Reunification Platform” also
stipulated that three direct links should be realized
sometime in the future. Now some people suggested that the
Platform be rectified and made the promise of realizing
three direct links within the year. However, there has been
no concrete action to date. The major problem that impedes
the direct services lies on the side of Taiwan, not on the
side of Mainland. As long as it is agreed that it is
navigation lane inside one country, the specific questions
about direct shipping service will be readily solved.
Methods can be simplified as much as possible for that
matter. For instance, direct shipping link can be
established either between Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan or
between Fuzhou, Xiamen and kaohsiung and ships of both sides
should be allowed to enter in each other’s port.
The key is whether the Taiwan authorities are
sincere about improving cross-straits
relations.
During the meeting, Qian expressed
his concern about the human and property losses caused by
the hurricane which hit Taiwan not long ago and offered his
condolences and regards to the people in the
disaster-stricken area. He also spoke highly of the media's
role in bringing people across the Taiwan Straits closer,
enhancing mutual understanding, clearing up misunderstanding
and broadening common ground of people on both sides of the
Straits. He voiced the hope that the press circles on both
sides of the Straits will increase exchanges so as to play
an even greater role in promoting the development of
cross-Straits relations and realizing national
reunification.
August 28, 2000
|